Research Results
Page 6
Converting English
Measurements to Dutch Measurements Given Measurements from Prizes James C. Bender 2003
I want to focus on East
Indiamen, especially the Vogelstruis
(the English Estridge).
I believe that
Retourschepen had a large rake and thick sides. Our main evidence is the Prins
Willem model. English beam
measurements are outside the planking, while the Dutch measurements are
inside the planking. That causes the Dutch-to-English beam ratio for
Indiamen to be close to 1.05, while the more normal Dutch ship had a ratio
more like 1.13. The normal Dutch ship would have a Dutch length-to-English
length ratio of 1.33. The retourschep would have a greater ratio.
|
English Name
|
Mathias
|
Estridge
|
? |
Rosebush
|
|
Dutch Name
|
St.Matheeus
|
Vogelstruis
|
Oranje
|
Rozeboom
|
|
Date Captured
|
1653
|
1653
|
1665
|
1653
|
|
Date Built
|
? |
1640
|
1643
|
? |
|
English Gundeck Length (est.)
|
137 ft-6in
|
152 ft-8 in, est.
|
162 ft-6in, est.
|
107 ft, est.
|
|
English Keel Length
|
108 ft
|
116 ft
|
123 ft-6in, est.
|
84 ft
|
|
English Beam
|
32 ft
|
36 ft-3 in
|
36 ft-3 in, est.
|
24 ft-6 in
|
|
English Depth
|
15 ft
|
17 ft
|
17 ft, est.
|
11 ft-6 in
|
|
Dutch Length
|
144 ft
|
160 ft
|
170 ft
|
118 ft
|
|
Depth Beam
|
36 ft
|
38 ft
|
38 ft
|
27 ft
|
|
Dutch Hold
|
?
|
18 ft
|
18 ft, est.
|
12-1/2 ft
|
|
Dutch/English Length
|
1.333
|
1.379
|
1.377 est.
|
1.405
|
|
Dutch/English Beam
|
1.125
|
1.048
|
1.048 est.
|
1.102
|
|
Dutch/English Depth
|
?
|
1.059
|
1.059 est.
|
1.087
|
The retourschepen (East
Indiamen) were long and narrow, as were the frigate-built Dutch warships
from the 1630's and 1640's. A radical change came with the building of the
Vrijheid
in 1651, at Amsterdam. The Vrijheid
had a smaller ratio between length and beam. Many later large warships
followed this pattern, in the following 15 years.
|
Name
|
Vrijheid
|
Zeven Provinciën
|
Aemelia
|
|
Date
|
1651
|
1665
|
1636
|
|
Guns
|
44-60
|
80-84
|
57
|
|
Admiralty
|
Amsterdam
|
Rotterdam
|
Rotterdam
|
|
Length
|
134 ft
|
163 ft
|
144 ft
|
|
Beam
|
34 ft
|
43 ft
|
34 ft
|
|
Depth
|
13.25 ft
|
16.5 ft
|
14.3 ft
|
|
Length/Beam
|
3.941
|
3.791
|
4.235
|
|
Length/Depth
|
10.11
|
9.88
|
10.07
|
* * *
|
Name
|
Eendracht
|
Huis te Zwieten
|
Stavoren
|
|
Date
|
1653
|
1653
|
1653
|
|
Guns
|
58-73
|
60-70
|
32-46
|
|
Admiralty
|
Rotterdam
|
Amsterdam
|
Amsterdam
|
|
Length
|
150 ft
|
146
|
130
|
|
Beam
|
38 ft
|
36
|
32
|
|
Depth
|
15 ft
|
14
|
13.5
|
|
Length/Beam
|
3.947
|
4.056
|
4.063
|
|
Length/Depth
|
10.0
|
10.43
|
9.63
|
* * *
|
Name
|
Ridderschap van Holland
|
Provincie van Utrecht
|
Eendracht
|
|
Date
|
1666
|
1663
|
1666
|
|
Guns
|
66
|
64
|
76
|
|
Admiralty
|
Rotterdam
|
Amsterdam
|
Rotterdam
|
|
Length
|
150 ft
|
145
|
160
|
|
Beam
|
40 ft
|
37
|
42.5
|
|
Depth
|
15 ft
|
14.5
|
16
|
|
Length/Beam
|
3.75
|
3.919
|
3.765
|
|
Length/Depth
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
The ships built by the
two thirty-ship programs from the First Anglo-Dutch War were generally
similar in proportions to the Aemelia,
rather than the Vrijheid.
The admirals, especially Tromp, wanted to build to the Vrijheid
model, but they were overruled. The ships built were generally smaller
than desired by the admirals, as well. Only two large ships were built (the
Eendracht
and Groot Hollandia),
while the admirals would have liked more big ships. One proposal was for
larger ships.
|
Number
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
|
Length
|
150 ft
|
140 ft
|
136 ft
|
|
Beam
|
39 ft
|
37 ft
|
36 ft
|
|
Depth
|
15 ft
|
14 ft
|
14 ft
|
|
Orlop
|
7.5 ft
|
7.5 ft
|
7 ft
|
|
Length/Beam
|
3.846
|
3.784
|
3.778
|
|
Length/Depth
|
10.0
|
10.0
|
9.71
|
As you can see, these are Vrijheid-like
proportions.
What was actually planned to
be built were narrower and smaller:
|
Number
|
1
|
10
|
19
|
|
Length
|
150 ft
|
136 ft
|
130 ft
|
|
Beam
|
38 ft
|
34 ft
|
32 ft
|
|
Depth
|
15 ft
|
14 ft
|
13.5 ft
|
|
Orlop
|
8 ft
|
7.5 ft
|
7 ft
|
|
Length/Beam
|
3.947
|
4.0
|
4.063
|
|
Length/Depth
|
10.0
|
9.71
|
9.63
|
In the end, this was not
followed exactly, as there was more variation in size, and Amsterdam built
some larger ships, although only to a 140 foot-charter. The Amsterdam
was 140 ft x 34.5 ft x 14 ft; the 44-gun Hollandia
was long and narrow (142 ft x 32.5 ft x 14.5 ft).
The 60-ship program started in
1664 was for Vrijheid-like
ships, generally. The authorities had 11 years to reflect on the navy's
needs, and they were more ready to spend whatever was necessary to have a
competitive battle fleet. The Battle of Lowestoft only reinforced that
lesson. Many of the new, larger ships were in service for the Four Days
Battle. The readiness to build better ships carried the Dutch through the
succeeding two wars (the second and third wars). The Dutch performance
further improved, once they had solved the political problem and installed
Willem III as king. The stewing Republican-Orangist problem always loomed as
an issue, until then.
Published Sources:
- Fox, Frank, Great
Ships: The Battlefleet of King Charles II,
Greenwich, 1980.
- Ketting, Herman, Prins
Willem, Bielefeld, 1981.
- Vreugdenhil, A., Ships
of the United Netherlands, 1648-1702,
London, 1938.
Unpublished Sources:
-
Nationaal Archief (Den
Haag) 1.03.02 Inv. No. 8, Directors' ships from January
1653.
-
Personal
communication from Herbert Tomesen, Artitec, regarding the East
Indiaman Oranje.
|